On the 29th, at the Legislation and Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly, Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Eui-gyeom and Board of Audit and Inspection Secretary General Yoo Byeong-ho clashed head-on.
On the 9th, the Board of Audit and Inspection conducted a service audit of Jeon Hyun-hee, former chairman of the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, who was suspected of attendance and attendance, and released the results of the ‘institutional caution’ disposition. ‘ and claims that the final audit results were illegally disclosed. The Board of Audit and Inspection is in the position that there is no problem because the chief judge does not have the authority to actually approve, but is at the level of reading.
When Rep. Kim asked, “Does Commissioner Cho Eun-seok’s computer have two buttons, View and Reject?” Secretary-General Yoo said, “I didn’t even look at the button. Since Dangun, Commissioner Jo has read the most.”
When Rep. Kim asked again, “Have you read the case of former Chairman Jeon Hyun-hee?” Secretary-General Yoo said, “I have read it several times. Even the undecided ones were forced by the staff and fixed a lot. I have been at the Board of Audit and Inspection for 27 years, and it is the first time I have ever seen you read it so often.”
Senator Kim’s voice began to rise. Rep. Kim said, “That means that you are faithful to your work, doesn’t it mean there is a problem? When asked if he had read Jeon Hyeon-hee or not, Secretary-General Yoo repeated the same words, saying, “I have read the most since Dangun.” During this process, Rep. Kim frowned and closed his eyes, and his voice rose even higher.
Rep. Kim said, “Even if you have read the most since Dangun안전놀이터, answer whether or not you have read Jeon Hyun-hee.” Rep. Kim said, “Did you read it on the e-government monitor? Don’t talk and answer.” Secretary-General Yoo replied, “That’s it, ask him.”
Rep. Kim and Secretary-General Yoo each said what they wanted to say, creating a scene that was different from the usual Jill. Usually, the officials of the audited institutions were intimidated by the lawmakers who bullied them and were unable to speak properly, but on this day, Congressman Kim seemed to be pushed by Secretary-General Yoo, who poured out his determination, and the questions continued to be cut off.
Before Rep. Kim even asked a question, Secretary-General Yoo said, “That is the law of Rep. Kim. It is the first time in 74 years (in the history of the Board of Audit and Inspection) that he did not press (approval) after seeing it so heartily.” Rep. Kim cut off his words in a loud voice, saying, “Only answer questions.”
Not being defeated by this, Secretary-General Yoo said, “All the members have been pressing for 74 years, but only he (Cho Eun-seok, audit committee member) was passive in pressing why.” They were coerced and deceived beyond the scope of their authority.”
To Secretary-General Yoo, who kept emphasizing “since Dangun” in the answering process, Rep. Kim said, “The audit committee member Cho Eun-seok was born in 1965, so what kind of Dangun are you looking for?” “He scolded the late Secretary-General Yoo.
However, Secretary-General Yu said, “The secretariat did not touch the audit report, and the only thing (Commissioner Cho) illegally subtracted from the committee meeting. Only the fatal serious crimes of former chairman Jeon Hyun-hee were deleted. Is it possible? That in itself is a crime.” Rep. Kim said, “Listen to the story. Is it okay to interfere like that?”
In the National Assembly, there was a response that it was the biggest war of words between the judiciary member and the secretary general of the Board of Audit and Inspection ‘since Dangun’.